WTF
Wrong Team Favored
Underdog opportunities identified by the model.
Record
167-209
Win Rate
44.4%
376 resolved recommendations
Performance
A transparent record of resolved recommendations across the platform. Results include every tracked win, loss, and push. Pushes are excluded from win-rate calculations.
Overall Record
Record
470-529-1
W-L-P
Win Rate
47%
Excludes pushes
Graded Plays
999
Wins + losses
Resolved Plays
1000
Includes pushes
System Breakdown
WTF, RTF, and Total Takeover identify different types of market opportunities. Their historical records are shown separately so each system can be evaluated on its own.
WTF
Underdog opportunities identified by the model.
Record
167-209
Win Rate
44.4%
376 resolved recommendations
RTF
Favorite opportunities where sufficient value remains.
Record
93-114
Win Rate
44.9%
207 resolved recommendations
TT
Over and under opportunities based on projected game environments.
Record
209-206-1
Win Rate
50.4%
416 resolved recommendations
Recommendation History
Latest 25
NBA • TT
Tier 1TOTALUtah @ Houston
Why This Play?
TT identifies OVER 221.5 (-105) as a high-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 226.12 points against a market total of 221.50, a difference of +4.62 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NBA • TT
Tier 1TOTALAtlanta @ Chicago
Why This Play?
TT identifies UNDER 245.5 (-108) as a high-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 241.50 points against a market total of 245.50, a difference of -4.00 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NBA • TT
Tier 1TOTALGolden State @ San Antonio
Why This Play?
TT identifies OVER 218.5 (-105) as a high-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 222.21 points against a market total of 218.50, a difference of +3.71 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NBA • TT
Tier 1TOTALNew York @ Indiana
Why This Play?
TT identifies OVER 219.5 (-108) as a high-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 222.92 points against a market total of 219.50, a difference of +3.42 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • TT
Tier 2TOTALNashville Predators @ Vegas Golden Knights
Why This Play?
TT identifies UNDER 6.5 (-135) as a moderate-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 5.84 goals against a market total of 6.50, a difference of -0.66 goals.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NBA • WTF
Tier 2SPREADMemphis @ New Orleans
Why This Play?
WTF identifies New Orleans +3.5 (-112) as a moderate-strength spread opportunity. The model projects the selected team to finish with a margin of -1.19 points, compared with a recommended spread of +3.50. This produces a projected ATS cushion of +2.31 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • RTF
Tier 3MONEYLINENew York Rangers @ Vancouver Canucks
Why This Play?
RTF identifies New York Rangers ML (-225) as a low-strength moneyline opportunity. The supplied model win-probability estimate is 70.7% for the selected team. The listed moneyline price is -225. This estimate is separate from the analytical score and engine-selected edge.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • WTF
Tier 1MONEYLINEDetroit Red Wings @ Florida Panthers
Why This Play?
WTF identifies Florida Panthers ML (+154) as a high-strength moneyline opportunity. The supplied model win-probability estimate is 64.4% for the selected team. The listed moneyline price is +154. This estimate is separate from the analytical score and engine-selected edge.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • RTF
Tier 1MONEYLINEMontreal Canadiens @ Boston Bruins
Why This Play?
RTF identifies Boston Bruins ML (-125) as a high-strength moneyline opportunity. The supplied model win-probability estimate is 70.4% for the selected team. The listed moneyline price is -125. This estimate is separate from the analytical score and engine-selected edge.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • RTF
Tier 1MONEYLINETampa Bay Lightning @ Columbus Blue Jackets
Why This Play?
RTF identifies Tampa Bay Lightning ML (-115) as a high-strength moneyline opportunity. The supplied model win-probability estimate is 65.5% for the selected team. The listed moneyline price is -115. This estimate is separate from the analytical score and engine-selected edge.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NBA • TT
Priority #5Tier 1TOTALCharlotte @ Phoenix
Why This Play?
TT identifies OVER 214.5 (-108) as a high-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 218.30 points against a market total of 214.50, a difference of +3.80 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • RTF
Tier 1MONEYLINEBuffalo Sabres @ Chicago Blackhawks
Why This Play?
RTF identifies Buffalo Sabres ML (-155) as a high-strength moneyline opportunity. The supplied model win-probability estimate is 71.2% for the selected team. The listed moneyline price is -155. This estimate is separate from the analytical score and engine-selected edge.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • TT
Tier 1TOTALWinnipeg Jets @ Dallas Stars
Why This Play?
TT identifies UNDER 5.5 (+100) as a high-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 5.19 goals against a market total of 5.50, a difference of -0.31 goals.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NBA • TT
Tier 1TOTALDetroit @ Washington
Why This Play?
TT identifies OVER 220.5 (-112) as a high-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 224.21 points against a market total of 220.50, a difference of +3.71 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NFL • TT
Tier 1TOTALWashington Commanders @ New York Giants
Why This Play?
TT identifies OVER 40.5 (-118) as a high-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 44.42 points against a market total of 40.50, a difference of +3.92 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • TT
Tier 1TOTALMinnesota Wild @ Toronto Maple Leafs
Why This Play?
TT identifies UNDER 6.5 (-115) as a high-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 5.94 goals against a market total of 6.50, a difference of -0.56 goals.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • RTF
Tier 1MONEYLINEWashington Capitals @ New Jersey Devils
Why This Play?
RTF identifies New Jersey Devils ML (-142) as a high-strength moneyline opportunity. The supplied model win-probability estimate is 66.3% for the selected team. The listed moneyline price is -142. This estimate is separate from the analytical score and engine-selected edge.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • RTF
Tier 1MONEYLINESt. Louis Blues @ Utah Mammoth
Why This Play?
RTF identifies Utah Mammoth ML (-120) as a high-strength moneyline opportunity. The supplied model win-probability estimate is 61.0% for the selected team. The listed moneyline price is -120. This estimate is separate from the analytical score and engine-selected edge.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • RTF
Tier 1MONEYLINEColorado Avalanche @ Ottawa Senators
Why This Play?
RTF identifies Colorado Avalanche ML (-120) as a high-strength moneyline opportunity. The supplied model win-probability estimate is 61.0% for the selected team. The listed moneyline price is -120. This estimate is separate from the analytical score and engine-selected edge.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NBA • WTF
Tier 1SPREADToronto @ Philadelphia
Why This Play?
WTF identifies Toronto +7.5 (-115) as a high-strength spread opportunity. The model projects the selected team to finish with a margin of -4.57 points, compared with a recommended spread of +7.50. This produces a projected ATS cushion of +2.93 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NCAAF • TT
Tier 2TOTALLouisiana @ UL Monroe
Why This Play?
TT identifies OVER 47.5 (-115) as a moderate-strength totals opportunity. The model projects 50.65 points against a market total of 47.50, a difference of +3.15 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NBA • RTF
Tier 3MONEYLINEDallas @ Minnesota
Why This Play?
RTF identifies Minnesota ML (-225) as a low-strength moneyline opportunity. The supplied model win-probability estimate is 71.8% for the selected team. The listed moneyline price is -225. This estimate is separate from the analytical score and engine-selected edge.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NCAAF • WTF
Tier 3SPREADMemphis @ South Florida
Why This Play?
WTF identifies South Florida +4.0 (-110) as a low-strength spread opportunity. The model projects the selected team to finish with a margin of -2.77 points, compared with a recommended spread of +4.00. This produces a projected ATS cushion of +1.23 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NHL • RTF
Tier 3MONEYLINENew York Islanders @ Los Angeles Kings
Why This Play?
RTF identifies Los Angeles Kings ML (-125) as a low-strength moneyline opportunity. The supplied model win-probability estimate is 56.8% for the selected team. The listed moneyline price is -125. This estimate is separate from the analytical score and engine-selected edge.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
NCAAB • WTF
Priority #1Tier 1SPREADRobert Morris @ Arkansas
Why This Play?
WTF identifies Robert Morris +29.5 (-102) as a high-strength spread opportunity. The model projects the selected team to finish with a margin of -17.98 points, compared with a recommended spread of +29.50. This produces a projected ATS cushion of +11.52 points.
Full evidence, risk analysis, and guidance available in the recommendation breakdown.
Transparency
Historical performance describes previously resolved recommendations and does not guarantee future outcomes. WTF is designed to expose the model's reasoning, recommendation strength, and risk so you can evaluate each opportunity for yourself.